2025年4月24日 4:47 星期四
首页 > 过刊浏览>2025年第26卷第4期 >693-707. DOI:10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.20240706001
PDF HTML阅读 XML下载 导出引用 引用提醒
制干枣种质资源果实品质综合评价
作者:
作者单位:

1.山西农业大学园艺学院，晋中030800;2.山西农业大学果树研究所/果树种质创制和利用山西省重点实验室，太原030031

作者简介:

研究方向为枣种质资源创新与利用， E-mail： 2320207476@qq.com

通讯作者:

王永康，研究方向为枣种质资源与遗传育种， E-mail：274322374@qq.com

基金项目:

山西省科技重大专项计划“揭榜挂帅”项目（202201140601027）；农业农村部作物种质资源保护专项（111721301354052002）；国家科技资源共享服务平台项目（NHGRC2024-NH12-1）；国家现代农业产业技术体系 （CARS-30-5-02，CARS-30-ZZ-22）；山西农业大学“十四五”生物育种工程项目（YZGC031）


Comprehensive Evaluation of Fruit Quality of Dried Jujube Germplasm Resources
Author:
Affiliation:

1.College of Horticulture， Shanxi Agricultural University， Jinzhong 030800;2.Institute of Fruit Trees， Shanxi Agricultural University/Shanxi Key Laboratory of Fruit Tree Germplasm Creation and Utilization， Taiyuan 030031

Fund Project:

Foundation projects： Shanxi Provincial Major Science and Technology Special Plan Revealed the List of Project Funding （202201140601027）； Special Project on the Protection of Species and Resources of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs （111721301354052002）； National Science and Technology Resource Sharing Service Platform Project （NHGRC2024-NH12-1）； China Agriculture Research System （CARS-30-5-02， CARS-30-ZZ-22）； Shanxi Agricultural University's "14th Five-Year Plan" Biological Breeding Project （YZGC031）

  • 摘要
    • | |
  • 访问统计
    • |
  • 参考文献 [25]
    • | | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    选取197份制干枣种质作为研究对象，基于层次分析法对其物性、外观和内在品质分析评价，从22项品质性状中选取关键性指标，构建综合评价体系；采用层次分析与灰色关联度相结合的方法对干枣种质果实品质进行全面分析和综合评价，并分别根据等权及加权关联度对其进行排序，筛选优异制干枣种质。结果表明，干枣种质果实品质间存在一定差异，变异系数为5.687%~68.430%；品质性状各指标间存在不同程度的相关性，鲜枣果实粘附性与干枣果实咀嚼度呈显著负相关；采用层次分析法构建了干枣种质果实品质综合评价模型，结合相关性分析结果确定了干枣咀嚼度、干枣单果重、干枣硬度、干枣果皮平展度、干枣果实颜色、干枣可溶性糖含量、干枣可溶性固形物含量7项关键性状为评价干枣果实品质特性主要指标；对197份枣种质进行了品质评价，依据灰色关联分析结果，筛选出15份综合品质优异的制干枣种质。本研究为优良制干枣种质精准鉴定和高效利用提供科学依据。

    Abstract:

    197 dry jujube germplasm accessions were applied in this study， a evaluation system was developed through of physical， appearance， and intrinsic quality traits， with 22 quality traits initially considered. Key indices were selected to construct the evaluation framework， and a combined approach of hierarchical analysis and gray correlation analysis were deployed to thoroughly analyze and comprehensively evaluate the fruit quality of dry jujube germplasm. Superior germplasm was identified based on weight and weighted correlation values.The results revealed significant variability in physical， appearance， and internal quality traits， with coefficients of variation ranging from 5.687% to 68.430%. Various correlations were observed among the quality traits. A significant negative correlation was observed between the adhesion of fresh jujube fruits and the chewiness of dried jujube fruits. To systematically evaluate the fruit quality traits of dried jujube germplasm， a comprehensive evaluation model was constructed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process （AHP）. Combining the results of correlation analysis， seven key traits included dried jujube chewiness， dried jujube fruit weight， dried jujube haedness， dried jujube peel flat range， dried jujube fruit color， dried jujube total soluble sugar content and dried jujube soluble solid content were contentidentified as primary indicators for assessing dried jujube fruit quality. The quality of 197 samples was systematically evaluated， leading to the identification of 15 accessions with outstanding comprehensive quality for dried jujube production.

    参考文献
    [1] 刘孟军. 枣优质生产技术手.北京:中国农业出版社, 2004: 275-323Liu M J. Handbook of high-quality production technology of jujube. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2004: 275-323
    [2] 曲泽洲,王永蕙. 中国果树志:枣卷.北京:中国林业出版社, 1993Qu Z Z, Wang Y H. Chinese fruit trees:Jujube rolls. Beijing: China Forestry Press, 1993
    [3] 张慧艺,汪丽霞,吴伊静,毕旭灿, 王刚, 赵四清, 徐昌杰, 陈昆松. 18份胡柚种质果实品质分析与综合评价.果树学报, 2024, 41(6):1033-1043Zhang H Y, Wang L X, Wu Y J, Bi X C, Wang G, Zhao S Q, Xu C J, Chen K S. Analysis and comprehensive evaluation offruit quality of 18 grapefruit germplasms. Journal of Fruit Science, 2024, 41(6):1033-1043
    [4] 赵双,黄颖宏,郄红丽. 30个杨梅品种果实品质分析与综合评价.果树学报, 2024, 41(3):392-402Zhao S, Huang Y H, Xi H L. Fruit quality analysis and comprehensive evaluation of 30 bayberry cultivars. Journal of Fruit Science, 2024, 41(3):392-402
    [5] 薛晓芳,焦文丽,苏万龙,任海燕, 王永康, 石美娟, 李登科, 赵爱玲. 枣种质资源果实质地品质特性分析.西北农业学报, 2024, 33(7):1318-1328Xue X F, Jiao W L, Su W L, Ren H Y, Wang Y K, Shi M J, Li D K, Zhao A L. Analysis of fruit quality characteristics of jujube germplasm resources. Journal of Northwest Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 33(7):1318-1328
    [6] 李慧,魏天军. 30个鲜食枣种质果实品质综合评价.中国果树, 2024 (2):68-74Li H, Wei T J. Comprehensive evaluation of fruit luality of 30 fresh jujube germplasms. China Fruit Trees, 2024 (2):68-74
    [7] 艾海提·克然木,合塔尔·扎热,吴正保.‘灰枣’果实外观品质指标相关性分析.浙江林业科技, 2023, 43(1):89-93Ahti K, Ghattar Z, Wu Z B. Correlation analysis of fruit appearance and quality indices of 'Gray Jujube'. Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2023, 43(1): 89-93
    [8] 李慧,魏天军.基于主成分和灰色关联度分析的鲜食枣果实品质评价.经济林研究, 2021, 39(1):60-67Li H, Wei T J. Quality evaluation of fresh jujube fruit based on principal component and grey correlation analysis. Economic Forest Research, 2021, 39(1):60-67
    [9] 贾宇尧.基于传统品质与代谢组学的不同产地骏枣与灰枣干果品质研究.杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2023Jia Y Y. Study on dried fruit quality of Jun jujube and gray jujube from different origins based on traditional quality and metabolomics. Yangling:Northwest A&F University, 2023
    [10] 樊保国,李月梅,张强,李登科, 杜学梅.中阳木枣品种群果实制干品质性状及其综合评价.西北农林科技大学学报, 2019, 47(12):130-139Fan B G, Li Y M, Zhang Q, Li D K, Du X M. Fruit drying quality traits and their comprehensive evaluation of Zhongyang jujube cultivars. Journal of Northwest A&F University, 2019, 47(12):130-139
    [11] 张梅,王利娜,王姝婧,杨智鹏,马路婷, 刘伟峰, 魏喜喜, 李建贵.基于层次-关联度的新疆骏枣品质性状分析及综合评价.中南林业科技大学学报, 2022, 42(1):78-85Zhang M, Wang L N, Wang S J, Yang Z P, Ma L T, Liu W F, Wei X X, Li J G. Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of quality of Xinjiang jun jujube based on hierarchy-correlation degree. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2022, 42(1):78-85
    [12] 禄彩丽,何秉宇,马珊,张梅,魏喜喜,宋健,刘伟锋,李建贵.环塔里木盆地骏枣质地品质及其与气象因子的关系.西北农林科技大学学报, 2021, 49(2):45-53Lu C L, He B Y, Ma S, Zhang M, Wei X X, Song J,Liu W F, Li J G. Texture quality of jujube and its relationship with meteorological factors in the tarim basin. Journal of Northwest A&F University, 2021, 49(2):45-53
    [13] 黄瑶,刘丰鸣,赵文,孙佳, 万胜, 王利娜, 王姝婧, 杨智鹏, 马路婷, 禄彩丽, 李建贵.新疆不同产区灰枣和骏枣的质构分析.经济林研究, 2022, 40(3):65-76Huang Y, Liu F M, Zhao W, Sun J, Wan S, Wang L N, Wang S J, Yang Z P, Ma L T, Lu C L. Texture analysis of gray jujube and jun jujube in different producing areas of Xinjiang. Economic Forest Research, 2022, 40(3):65-76
    [14] 樊保国,李月梅,张强,杜学梅, 王永康,李振岗.中阳木枣系品种果实制干品质的综合评价方法.中国农业大学学报, 2019,24(5):150-160Fan B G, Li Y M, Zhang Q, Du X M, Wang Y K, Li Z G. Comprehensive evaluation method of fruit drying quality of Zhongyang wood jujube varieties. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2019, 24 (5):150-160
    [15] 王博.宁夏引进枣种质资源生长表现及果实品质评价与分析.银川:宁夏大学, 2023Wang B. Evaluation and analysis of the growth performance and fruit quality of imported jujube germplasm resources in Ningxia. Yinchuan:Ningxia University, 2023
    [16] 弓成林,郭爱民,汪小伟,李骏,蔡智勇. 灰色关联度和层次分析法在葡萄品质评价上的应用. 西南农业学报, 2002(1): 79-82Gong C L, Guo A M, Wang X W, Li J, Cai Z Y. Application of gray correlation and hierarchical analysis in grape quality evaluation. Southwest Agricultural University, 2002(1): 79-82
    [17] 吴昊,苏万龙,石美娟,薛晓芳,任海燕,王永康,赵爱玲,李登科.枣种质果实性状多样性分析与综合评价.植物遗传资源学报, 2022, 23(6):1613-1625Wu H, Su W L, Shi M J, Xue X F, Ren H Y, Wang Y K, Zhao A L, Li D K. Analysis and comprehensive valuation of fruit traits in jujube germplasm and fruits. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2022, 23(6):1613-1625
    [18] 樊保国,李登科.制干枣品种品质性状的因子分析与综合评价.植物遗传资源学报, 2011, 12(5):716-720Fan B G, Li D K. Factor analysis and comprehensive evaluation of quality traits of dried jujube varieties. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2011, 12(5):716-720
    [19] Saatyt L. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McCraw-Hill Inc,1980
    [20] 李登科.枣种质资源描述规范和数据标准.北京:中国农业出版社, 2006Li D K. Jujube germplasm resources description specifications and data standards. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2006
    [21] 王雷存,樊红科,赵政阳,王飞, 高华.基于层次分析和熵值法的苹果杂交F1代果实性状综合选择模式研究.北方园艺, 2011 (21): 4-8Wang L C, Fan H K, Zhao Z Y, Wang F, Gao H. Analysis of fruit traits in F1 based on hierarchical analysis and entropy method. Northern Horticulture, 2011 (21): 4-8
    [22] 沈甜,牛锐敏,黄小晶,许泽华,陈卫平.基于层次-关联度和主成分分析的无核鲜食葡萄品质评价.食品工业科技, 2021, 42(3):53-60Shen T, Niu R M, Huang X J, Xu Z H,Chen W P. Quality evaluation of seedless grapes based on hierarchy-correlation and principal component analysis. Food Industry Technology, 2021, 42 (3):53-60
    [23] 邓健康,刘璇,吴昕烨,毕金峰,焦艺.基于层次分析和灰色关联度法的苹果(等外果)汁品质评价.中国食品学报, 2017, 17(4):197-208Deng J K, Liu X, Wu X Y, Bi J F, Jiao Y. Quality evaluation of apple (and other exodex) juice based on hierarchical analysis and gray correlation method. Chinese Food Journal, 2017,17 (4):197-208
    [24] 万胜,杨智鹏,黄瑶,王磊,孙佳.南疆不同地区灰枣果实品质性状分析及综合评价.经济林研究, 2022, 40(4):143-152Wan S, Yang Z P, Huang Y, Wang L, Sun J. Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality traits in different regions of southern Xinjiang. Economic Forest Research, 2022, 40(4):143-152
    [25] 范士杰.试用灰色关联度分析评价油菜区试品种.种子, 1997(3):55-58Fan S J. Trial grey correlation degree analysis to evaluate the rapeseed area test varieties. Seed, 1997(3):55-58
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

陈鑫如,石美娟,王亚兴,等.制干枣种质资源果实品质综合评价[J].植物遗传资源学报,2025,26(4):693-707.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:30
  • 下载次数: 55
  • HTML阅读次数: 18
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-06
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-04-03
文章二维码
您是第5788485位访问者
ICP:京ICP备09069690号-23
京ICP备09069690号-23
植物遗传资源学报 ® 2025 版权所有
技术支持：北京勤云科技发展有限公司
请使用 Firefox、Chrome、IE10、IE11、360极速模式、搜狗极速模式、QQ极速模式等浏览器，其他浏览器不建议使用!