2025年4月4日 18:27 星期五
首页 > 过刊浏览>2025年第26卷第4期 >808-816. DOI:10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.20240907001
PDF HTML阅读 XML下载 导出引用 引用提醒
花生网斑病抗性基因的遗传分析及QTL定位
作者:
作者单位:

1.山西农业大学植物保护学院，太原 030031;2.山西农业大学经济作物研究所，太原 030031;3.山西农业大学农学院，太谷 030801

作者简介:

研究方向为植物病理学，E-mail：1460615989@qq.com

通讯作者:

张 鑫， 研究方向为花生遗传育种， E-mail： 15177178@qq.com

基金项目:

山西省基础研究计划项目（202203021221178）；山西省科技重大专项（202201140601025）；国家花生产业技术体系建设专项（CARS-13）；山西农业大学生物育种工程项目（YZGC049）；山西省现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金（2024CYJSTX05）


Genetic Analysis and QTL Mapping of Resistance Genes for Peanut Web Blotch
Author:
Affiliation:

1.College of Plant Protection， Shanxi Agricultural University， Taiyuan 030031;2.Institute of Industrial Crops， Shanxi Agricultural University， Taiyuan 030031;3.College of Agronomy， Shanxi Agricultural University， Taigu 030801

Fund Project:

Foundation projects： The Fundamental Research Program of Shanxi Province （202203021221178）； The Science and Technology Major Project of Shanxi Province （202201140601025）； The National Peanut Industry Technology System Construction（CARS-13）； Biological Breeding Projects of Shanxi Agricultural University （YZGC049）； The Earnarked Fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System of Shanxi Province（2024CYJSTX05）

  • 摘要
    • | |
  • 访问统计
    • |
  • 参考文献 [33]
    • | | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    花生网斑病是发生在花生叶部的一种真菌性病害，严重时会影响花生的产量和品质。对花生网斑病抗性基因的遗传分析及QTL定位，有利于指导挖掘抗病种质资源，对指导花生育种具有重要意义。本研究以“花育44”和“DF12”构建的807份高世代RIL群体（F8）为研究材料，对网斑病抗性进行遗传模型分析和QTL定位。分析表明，花生网斑病抗性主要受MX1-A-AI模型控制，该模型结合了一对加性主基因及加性与上位性交互的多基因。在3个不同环境条件下，主基因的遗传率依次为63.44%、60.70%和74.64%；共检测到5个与网斑病抗性相关的QTL，分别为qDIA02.1、qDIA02.2、qDIB07、qDIB08、qDIB09，分布在4个连锁群上，可解释4.68%~15.91%的表型变异，其中qDIA02.1、qDIB07、qDIB09在3个环境下被重复检测到，分别解释了5.15%~9.43%、7.62%~15.91%、5.24%~6.16%的表型变异，且qDIB07可能为主效QTL，说明花生网斑病抗性以主基因效应调控为主。本研究成果既为花生网斑病抗性基因的准确定位提供了依据，同时也为花生抗病遗传改良提供了一定的理论基础。

    Abstract:

    Peanut web blotch， a fungal disease affecting the leaves of peanut plants， can substantially impact both yield and quality. Genetic analysis and QTL mapping of resistance genes against this disease are crucial for identifying resistant germplasm resources and advancing peanut breeding. This study employed a recombinant inbred line（RIL） population consisting of 807 individuals derived from the cross between 'Huayu 44' and 'DF12' to dissect the genetic basis through QTL mapping for resistance. The analysis showed that the resistance mechanism followed the MX1-A-AI inheritance model， characterized by a combination of one major additive gene and multiple minor-effect genes and epistatic interactions. The major gene exhibited substantial heritability across three environmental conditions （63.44%， 60.70% and 74.64%， respectively）. Through QTL mapping， we identified five QTLs， qDIA02.1， qDIA02.2， qDIB07， qDIB08， and qDIB09， distributed across four linkage groups， explaining 4.68%-15.91% of the phenotypic variation. Three QTLs， qDIA02.1， qDIB07， and qDIB09， were repeatedly detected across three environments， explaining 5.15%-9.43%， 7.62%-15.91%， and 5.24%-6.16% of phenotypic variation， respectively. qDIB07 was identified as a potential major QTL， indicating that peanut web blotch resistance is predominantly regulated by major genes. These findings provide a basis for future precisely localizing resistance genes to peanut web blotch and developing disease-resistant peanut varieties.

    参考文献
    [1] Wu X H, Zhang M Y, Zheng Z, Sun Z Y, Qi F Y, Liu H, Wang J, Wang M M, Zhao R, Wu Y, Wang X, Liu H F, Dong W Z, Zhang X Y. Fine-mapping of a candidate gene for web blotch resistance in Arachis hypogaea L.. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(5): 1494-1506
    [2] 张枫叶, 贺群岭, 陈雷, 李可, 吴继华, 张梦圆. 河南省麦套花生育成品种农艺、产量及品质性状综合鉴定与评价分析. 农业科技通讯, 2022(7): 122-128Zhang F Y, He Q L, Chen L, Li K, Wu J H, Zhang M Y. Comprehensive identification and evaluation of agronomic, yield, and quality traits of peanut cultivars in the wheat-peanut intercropping system in Henan province. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022(7), 122-128
    [3] 许欣然, 张新友, 汤丰收, 燕照玲, 王东国, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 杜培, 苗利娟, 刘华. 花生网斑病病原菌分离及生物学特性研究. 河南农业科学, 2014, 43(12): 91-95Xu X R, Zhang X Y, Tang F S, Yan Z L, Wang D G, Huang B Y, Dong W Z, Du P, Miao L J, Liu H. Isolation and biological characteristics study of Phoma arachidicola Marasas Pauer & Boerema. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 43(12): 91-95
    [4] 吴献忠, 张卫, 李荣花, 刘思国. 花生网斑病研究进展. 青岛农业大学学报, 2000, 17(4): 294-297Wu X Z, Zhang W, Li R H, Liu S G. Research progress on peanut web blotch. Journal of Qingdao Agricultural University, 2000, 17(4): 294-297
    [5] Liu H, Sun Z Q, Zhang X Y, Qin L, Qi F Y, Wang Z Y, Du P, Xu J, Zhang Z X, Han S Y, Li S Y, Gao M, Zhang L, Cheng Y J, Zheng Z, Huang B Y, Dong W Z. QTL mapping of web blotch resistance in peanut by high-throughput genome-wide sequencing. BMC Plant Biology, 2020, 20(1): 249
    [6] Zhang X, Xu M L, Wu J X, Dong W B, Chen D X, Wang L, Chi Y C. Draft genome sequence of Phoma arachidicola Wb2 causing peanut web blotch in China. Current Microbiology, 2019, 76(2): 200-206
    [7] 李绍建, 高蒙, 王娜, 崔小伟, 刘春燕, 王振宇. 花生网斑病不同病斑类型及其病原菌致病力差异. 植物保护, 2018, 44(3): 150-155Li S J, Gao M, Wang N, Cui X W, Liu C Y, Wang Z Y. Different lesion types of peanut web blotch and virulence differences of their pathogens. Plant Protection, 2018, 44(3): 150-155
    [8] 李绍建, 高蒙, 王娜, 范腕腕, 桑素玲, 杨光, 李航宇, 崔小伟, 王振宇. 花生网斑病原菌孢子差异及其致病力分析. 中国油料作物学报, 2022, 44(6): 1341-1348Li S J, Gao M, Wang N, Fan W W, Sang S L, Yang G, Li H Y, Cui X W, Wang Z Y. Differences in conidia of peanut web blotch pathogen and its pathogenicity analysis. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2022, 44(6): 1341-1348
    [9] 于静, 许曼琳, 张霞, 吴菊香, 董炜博, 迟玉成. 花生网斑病原菌鉴定及致病力的测定//中国作物学会油料作物专业委员会, 《中国油料作物学报》编辑部. 中国作物学会油料作物专业委员会第八次会员代表大会暨学术年会综述与摘要集. 青岛:山东省花生研究所, 2018:1Yu J, Xu M L, Zhang X, Wu J X, Dong W B, Chi Y C. Identification of the pathogen causing peanut web blotch and determination of its pathogenicity//Oil Crops Professional Committee of the Crop Science Society of China ,Editorial Office of the Chinese Journal of Oil Crops.Proceedings and abstracts of the 8th member representative conference and annual academic meeting of the Oil Crops Professional Committee of the Crop Science Society of China. Qingdao:Shandong Peanut Research Institute,2018: 1
    [10] 徐明显, 石延茂, 徐秀娟. 花生网斑病原培养和鉴定. 植物病理学报, 1992, 22(3): 80Xu M X, Shi Y M, Xu X J. Cultural characteristics and identity of causal fungus of peanut web blotch. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica, 1992, 22(3): 80
    [11] 张梦圆. 花生网斑病抗性遗传分析与QTL定位. 洛阳: 河南科技大学, 2022Zhang M Y. Genetic analysis and QTL mapping for peanut web blotch resistance. Luoyang: Henan University of Science and Technology, 2022
    [12] 程俞杰. 花生网斑病抗性全基因组关联分析及抗病机理的细胞学研究. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2021Cheng Y J.Genome association analysis of resistance to peanut web blotch and cytology study on the mechanism of resistance. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2022
    [13] 盖钧镒, 章元明, 王健康, 何小红. 植物数量性状泛主基因+多基因分离分析方法体系的拓展//江苏省遗传学会.江苏省遗传学会第七届二次代表大会暨学术研讨会论文摘要汇编. 南京:南京农业大学, 2008: 1Gai J Y, Zhang Y M, Wang J K, He X H. Separation of quantitative traits major gene-multigene genetic system in plants//Genetics Society of Jiangsu Province. Proceedings of abstracts of the 2nd session of the 7th representative assembly and academic symposium of the Genetics Society of Jiangsu Province. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2008: 1
    [14] 张新友. 栽培花生产量、品质和抗病性的遗传分析与QTL定位研究. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2012Zhang X Y. Inheritance of main traits related to yield,quality and disease resistance and their OTLs mapping in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2012
    [15] 张梦圆, 田梦迪, 孙子淇, 齐飞艳, 吴晓慧, 王娟, 赵瑞芳, 石欣隆, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 花生网斑病抗性遗传分析. 中国油料作物学报, 2023, 45(3): 608-613Zhang M Y, Tian M D, Sun Z Q, Qi F Y, Wu X H, Wang J, Zhao R F, Shi X L, Huang B Y, Dong W Z, Zheng Z, Zhang X Y. Genetic analysis of resistance to web blotch in peanut. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2023, 45(3): 608-613
    [16] 刘华, 秦利, 杜培, 孙子淇, 齐飞艳, 张忠信, 徐静, 韩锁义, 代小冬, 董文召, 张新友. 基于多世代分离群体的花生网斑病抗性遗传分析. 江苏农业学报, 2022, 38(2): 326-333Liu H, Qin L, Du P, Sun Z Q, Qi F Y, Zhang Z X, Xu J, Han S Y, Dai X D, Dong W Z, Zhang X Y. Genetic analysis of peanut web blotch resistance based on multi-generation segregation population. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 38(2): 326-333
    [17] Zhang X, Zhang X J, Wang L H, Liu Q M, Liang Y Y, Zhang J Y, Xue Y Y, Tian Y X, Zhang H Q, Li N, Sheng C, Nie P P, Feng S P, Liao B S, Bai D M. Fine mapping of a QTL and identification of candidate genes associated with cold tolerance during germination in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) on chromosome B09 using whole genome re-sequencing. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2023, 14: 1153293
    [18] 曹锡文, 刘兵, 章元明. 植物数量性状分离分析Windows软件包SEA的研制. 南京农业大学学报, 2013, 36(6): 1-6Cao X W, Liu B, Zhang Y M. SEA:A software package of segregation analysis of quantitative traits in plants. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2013, 36(6): 1-6
    [19] Li H, Ribaut J M, Li Z, Wang J. Inclusive composite interval mapping (ICIM) for digenic epistasis of quantitative traits in biparental populations. Theoretische and Angewandte Genetik, 2008, 116(2): 243-260
    [20] 郭建斌, 李威涛, 罗怀勇, 陈伟刚, 喻博伦, 黄莉, 刘念, 周小静, 姜慧芳. 花生种子大小相关性状QTL定位及与出仁率的关系. 植物遗传资源学报, 2022, 23(5): 1465-1473Guo J B, Li W T, Luo H Y, Chen W G, Yu B L, Huang L, Liu N, Zhou X J, Jiang H F. QTL mapping for seed size related traits and its relationship with shelling percentage in peanut. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2022, 23(5): 1465-1473
    [21] 任丽娟, 霍燕, 张鹏, 马鸿翔. 禾谷镰刀菌引起的小麦茎腐病抗性主基因+多基因混合遗传分析. 麦类作物学报, 2011, 31(2): 358-363Ren L J, Huo Y, Zhang P, Ma H X. The mixed inheritance analysis of resistance to crown rot caused by Fusarium graminearum in wheat. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2011, 31(2): 358-363
    [22] 张勇, 张伯桥, 高德荣, 程顺和. 小麦赤霉病抗源N553的主基因+多基因遗传分析. 中国农学通报, 2005(6): 305-307, 336Zhang Y, Zhang B Q, Gao D R, Cheng S H. Major genes plus polygenes inheritance of wheat scab in resource N553. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2005(6): 305-307, 336
    [23] 张勇, 张伯桥, 高德荣, 程顺和. 小麦抗病新材料S42抗赤霉病性的主基因+多基因遗传分析. 江苏农业学报, 2005(4): 272-276Zhang Y, Zhang B Q, Gao D R, Cheng S H. Major genes plus polygenes inheritance analysis of resistance to scab in a new wheat line S42. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2005(4): 272-276
    [24] 任丽娟, 颜伟, 陈怀谷, 姚金保, 马鸿翔. 小麦纹枯病抗性的主基因+多基因遗传分析. 江苏农业学报, 2010, 26(6): 1156-1161Ren L J, Yan W, Chen H G, Yao J B, Ma H X. Major genes plus polygenes inheritance analysis of resistance to wheat sharp eyespot. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 26(6): 1156-1161
    [25] 程伟东, 谭贤杰, 覃兰秋, 周锦国, 江禹奉, 谢和霞, 吴子恺. 玉米纹枯病抗性的主基因+多基因混合遗传分析. 玉米科学, 2009, 17(2): 1-6Cheng W D, Tan X J, Qin L Q, Zhou J G, Jiang Y F, Xie H X, Wu Z K. Genetic analysis of maize sheath blight resistance by using major gene plus polygene mixed inheritance model. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2009, 17(2): 1-6
    [26] 王建设, 王建康, 朱立宏, 盖钧镒. 水稻主基因-多基因混合遗传控制白叶枯病抗性的基因效应分析. 遗传学报, 2000(1): 34-38Wang J S, Wang J K, Zhu L H, Gai J Y. Gene effect analysis of major gene-polygene mixed inheritance controlling resistance to bacterial blight in rice. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 2000(1): 34-38
    [27] 张涛, 马正宝, 张茹, 汪来田, 王永富, 黄立娟, 郭娜纳, 李伟, 魏兵强. 辣椒白粉病抗性主基因+多基因混合遗传分析. 西北农业学报, 2024, 33(6): 1122-1130Zhang T, Ma Z B, Zhang R, Wang L T, Wang Y F, Huang L J, Guo N N, Li W, Wei B Q. Genetic analysis of resistance to powdery mildew by mixed model of major genes plus polygenes in chili paper. Journal of Northwest A&F University, 2024, 33(6): 1122-1130
    [28] 杨辉, 沈火林. 辣椒抗黄瓜病毒的主基因-多基因混合遗传分析.安徽农业科学, 2023, 51(13): 86-88Yang H, Shen H L. Analysis of main gene and polygene mixture heredity in pepper to CMV. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 51(13): 86-88
    [29] 方敦煌, 焦芳婵, 卢灿华, 谢贺, 曾建敏, 陈学军, 童治军. 烟草青枯病抗性的主基因+多基因混合遗传分析. 分子植物育种, 2023, 21(18): 6072-6079Fang D H, Jiao F C, Lu C H, Xie H, Zeng J M, Chen X J, Tong Z J. Genetic analysis on resistance to bacterial wilt of tobacco by mixture model of major gene plus polygene. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2023, 21(18): 6072-6079
    [30] 王晓帅, 梁明磊, 胡长敏, 王嵩, 倪皖莉, 江建华. 不同环境条件下花生产量相关农艺性状的遗传分析. 花生学报, 2016, 45(2): 9-14Wang X S, Liang M L, Hu C M, Wang S, Ni W L, Jiang J H. Genetic analysis of 9 yield-related peanut agronomic traits under 2 environments. Journal of Peanut Science, 2016, 45(2): 9-14
    [31] 张毛宁, 黄冰艳, 苗利娟, 徐静, 石磊, 张忠信, 孙子淇, 刘华, 齐飞艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 巢式杂交分离群体的花生籽仁性状的主基因+多基因混合遗传模型分析. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(13): 2916-2939Zhang M N, Huang B Y, Miao L J, Xu J, Shi L, Zhang Z X, Sun Z Q, Liu H, Qi F Y, Dong W Z, Zheng Z, Zhang X Y. Genetic analysis of peanut kernel traits in a nested-crossing population by major gene plus polygenes mixed model. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(13): 2916-2939
    [32] 黄冰艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 房元瑾, 石磊, 苗利娟, 张毛宁, 张忠信, 徐静, 张梦圆, 董文召, 张新友. 花生巢式群体的脂肪含量遗传分析. 作物学报, 2021, 47(6): 1100-1108Huang B Y, Sun Z Q, Liu H, Fang Y J, Shi L, Miao L J, Zhang M N, Zhang Z X, Xu J, Zhang M Y, Dong W Z, Zhang X Y. Genetic analysis of fat content based on nested populations in peanut(Arachis hypogaea L.). Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(6): 1100-1108
    [33] 薛云云, 张蕙琪, 张鑫, 田跃霞, 李娜, 梁煜莹, 张加羽, 张晓吉, 王露欢, 白冬梅. 花生RIL群体出仁率的遗传特性分析. 花生学报, 2024, 53(3): 9-13Xue Y Y, Zhang H Q, Zhang X, Tian Y X, Li N, Liang Y Y, Zhang J Y, Zhang X J, Wang L H, Bai D M. Genetic analysis of shelling percentage in RIL population of peanut. Journal of Peanut Science, 2024, 53(3): 9-13
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

刘齐妹,张晓宇,张晓吉,等.花生网斑病抗性基因的遗传分析及QTL定位[J].植物遗传资源学报,2025,26(4):808-816.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:2
  • 下载次数: 4
  • HTML阅读次数: 1
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-07
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-04-03
文章二维码
您是第5742661位访问者
ICP:京ICP备09069690号-23
京ICP备09069690号-23
植物遗传资源学报 ® 2025 版权所有
技术支持：北京勤云科技发展有限公司
请使用 Firefox、Chrome、IE10、IE11、360极速模式、搜狗极速模式、QQ极速模式等浏览器，其他浏览器不建议使用!